I see where we disagree.
You suggest a large version of the small logo and only the symbol/logo for
people to get a better idea.
-> Two pictures ( a 16-32 and a 120 ) are needed.


I suggest two different pictures
-> One with only the symbol ( 16-32 format)
-> One with the logo and a few more details ( 120 format and above).
When I mean with details, I mean with the symbol, the letters and effects


>
> The large format of the simple version of the logo will not have more
> details, but it will be much sharper, and be more clear, and less blurred of
> anti-aliasing.
>
> I can understand that you think there should be more details in the larger
> versions, but that is what the custom / fancy formats are for.

Well,in that case the 120 format ( the one used for the [ Banner-Homepage] will
look pretty empty ( with only the logo in it).



>
> Again, it's to show the simple versions in large formats. You can use
> shading and reflection too, but that should be in the custom/fancy formats.
> That's what the custom/fancy formats were made for after all.

To sum up, you suggest only two types of format

120 )


That still leaves a gap between these two formats.
It might be better to propose a more detailed one at 128 and leave the 180 or
(much) more for the splash-screen.


>
> You are suggesting that we should have free formats *only*

No, I just meant that the logo-designer ( or whatever you call him her) should
decide whether to use effects or not.
I agree that there should be a kind of standards ( in sizes)  just to compare
the logos, but in no way we should tell whether to use effects, gradients, plain
colors or not.


>
> With 3 different free formats the logo creator can really show how flexible
> the logo is. Some people have requested at least one large format, but I
> think 3 large formats would be too big in size, so I let the creator choose
> his favorite one or most detailed one for the large version.
>
> > And why in square format. Square format is
> > required for the 'tiny' logos ( 16 and 32 ).
> > Above 64, I don't think it is necessary.
>
> I said "180x180 or any resolution with max 32400 pixels". That mean that it
> doesn't have to be square. 180x180, 150x216, 120x270, 90x360, and many more
> resolutions will all give max 32400 pixels.
>

Post a reply to this message