>A 32x32 pixel black and white version. Shades of gray is allowed, but only
>for anti-aliasing. For the reason of keeping the sizes small I think 16
>shades of gray is enough. I personally hardly can tell the difference
>between 256 shades of gray and 16 shades of gray, when the shades of gray
is
>used only for anti-aliasing.


i agree.

>A 14400 pixel black and white version. This version must contain 14400
>pixels at most, but the logo-designers can decide for themselves if they
>want a 60x240, or 80x180, or 120x120 resolution, or something completely
>else. This is so no shapes of logos are favored. Shades of gray is allowed
>in the same way as in the previous version.


i agree.

>3 custom versions. For these 3 versions the size limit is 14400 pixels as
in
>the previous version, but any amount of colors may be used. These versions
>are supposed to show how interesting the logo can be presented, and how
>flexible it is. It is encouraged that the 3 versions are made as different
>as possible, to show flexibility.


would those 3 custom versions be obligatory?

>So, these 5 formats are my suggestion. What do you think of it?


nice :)

-alt

Post a reply to this message