"Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> wrote in message news:3921b255@news.povray.org...
{ 
{ "Bill DeWitt" wrote:
{ 
{ > 32X32X2
{ 
{ Is those 2 colors before or after AA? I think AA should be allowed in the 2
{ color versions.

Can't AA 2 color images and remain 2 colors.
 
{ > 32X32X16
{ 
{ I think max 16 colors in the simple color version would be fine :-)
{ AA should not count as colors though.

Can AA with this many colors but it won't look very antialiased.
 
{ > <=14400pX2
{ 
{ I agree.

Same concept.  The "jaggies" will abound but perhaps at this higher 
resolution it won't seem so bad.
 
{ > <=14400pX256
{ 
{ Hmm, why 256 colors?

256 color icons exist, so too do many splash screens and such.
 
{ > <=320000pX16m
{ > <=320000pX16m
{ > <=320000pX16m
{ 
{ On some screens there would not even be room for such large formats (for
{ example 565x565), especially not in a browser! Do you really need 3 giant
{ formats just to show the flexibility and fanciness-potential of a simple
{ logo?

Full screen sized logo does seem excessive, but one never knows the end uses.

{ I think Chris Huff's suggestion is more reasonable. He suggest that only ONE
{ of the "fancy" formats should be large, and not even that large.
{ 
{ What do others think?

I for one think I don't know Chris's idea there at the moment  :-)

Bob

Post a reply to this message