"Henry" wrote:
> The way my brain was thinking at the time
> was "Why not let the symbol of the art be
> the art itself?"

Your idea of selecting some best images of the year is probably very nice.
Only, it has nothing to do with a logo. You can't just take a word (such as
the word "logo") and decide for yourself what the word means. There may not
be very clear definitions of what a logo is, but I'm absolutely sure that
your idea falls outside any meaningful interpretation of the word. At least,
that's how I see it, and it seems that how many other people see it too.

It's like if Nike said: Why not let the symbol of shoes be the shoes
themselves? Rather than making a fixed logo, we find each year some pictures
of some of our shoes and use that as our logo.

That would be silly of course. I think you should look at what other
companies do. There just might be a reason that they do it that way...

But besides that, I wouldn't mind having selected some "best images of the
year". :-)

Greetings,

Rune

---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!

Post a reply to this message