Rune wrote:

> Your idea of selecting some best images of the year is probably very nice.
> Only, it has nothing to do with a logo. You can't just take a word (such as
> the word "logo") and decide for yourself what the word means. There may not
> be very clear definitions of what a logo is, but I'm absolutely sure that
> your idea falls outside any meaningful interpretation of the word. At least,
> that's how I see it, and it seems that how many other people see it too.

Words change, meanings of words change. Maybe it is time we redifine the
word logo to mean what we want it to. Let's bring the word logo into a
21st century context which includes computer generated 3D symbolisms and
complex abstractions. Let's be rebels !

-- 
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message