"Bill DeWitt" wrote:
> "Ron Parker" wrote:
> > > One of the best logos, for the most
> > > classy product in the world, for
> > > almost a hundred years, has been 3D.
> > > Can you guess what I am thinking of?
> >
> > Rolls-Royce hood ornament?
>
> http://www.ktsmotorsportsgarage.com/ault98/pages/rolls-spirit.html
>
> Absolutely. Although they call it a
> "mascot" it is far more recognized than
> the 'RR' logo they also use.

They call it a mascot. I do too.

You say it is a logo. Your only argument is that it is more recognized.

Why does the fact that it is more recognized make it a logo?

A mascot may be more recognized than a logo, but that doesn't mean that the
mascot *is* a logo.

I have yet to see a big, well-known company who has a logo that is not
presentable and easily recognizable in black and white (with no shades of
gray).

Greetings,

Rune

---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!

Post a reply to this message