"Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> wrote :
>
> May I take note that you almost agree with the description I made?
>

    Sure, and the "Almost" part is the part where you say "2D". In the past,
perhaps a flat logo was all they could do, but I think that we should be
able to think in 3D now. I can understand if "experts" aren't 3D ready, but
I am.

    One of the best logos, for the most classy product in the world, for
almost a hundred years, has been 3D. Can you guess what I am thinking of?

Post a reply to this message