I disagree with your statement. I do agree that the final logo should follow
those criteria, but why not leave the intitial submissions open to anything
anyone wants to submit as a logo. Then we can say, this doesn't make for a
good logo, then we can ask for what it would look like with less detail. As
it is stated in the article, you can't exactly always define what makes logo
good, but when you see it, you just know it. So I say make submissions open,
it keeps ideas floating around better and may spark someone else who comes
up with a good design.

--
Dan D.

Rune wrote in message...
> Would you submit a hand drawn image for the IRTC ? No.
> But what if was a really really nice hand drawn image?
> No, it wouldn't be accepted because the IRTC is for rendered images only.
>
> Likewise in the logo contest; it is for logos only. A logo is not just a
> word that can mean anything we want it to mean. All the experts agree that
a
> good logo is a simple piece of 2D graphics consisting of a few colors
only,
> and it must work in just black and white too. Since we want to find a good
> logo for POV-Ray, the submitted logos should follow these criteria.

Post a reply to this message