|
|
"Nathan Kopp" wrote:
> Rune wrote...
> > Secondly, the reason the logo should be
> > simple is not just that it must be
> > suitable for small resolutions, but
> > also that a simple logo is more flexible.
>
> And generally more memorable and more
> recognizable, which are two very
> important qualities of a logo.
Ideed! That's the whole point with the logo!
I must remember that argument :-)
Greetings,
Rune
---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!
Post a reply to this message
|
|