Phil Clute wrote:
> 
> Gilles mentioned that there may be need for a new Hall of Fame.
> It looks like the Hall of Fame hasn't been updated in a long
> time.
> I also agree with Gilles that we should keep the old Hall for
> historical purposes; but there's a few excellent artists(Gilles
> among them)who are not honored there and really should be.
> 
> What should the criterion be? ie. Who and what images?
> Should we vote(seems reasonable to me)?

The criteria should be photorealism and artistic value.  IRTC
winners should be considered first, of course.

-- 
ICQ: 46085459

Post a reply to this message