>i think they all suck.  i agree with bob's comment that these logos
>don't show what pov can do.  i think a logo should.  were any of them
>even done with pov?  they could've been done in paint shop pro so far as
>i can tell.

does softimages logo show what softimage can do?
how about lightwaves logo?
or 3dstudio?

logo is plain symbol, it doesn't have to present the quality of software
itself.
pictures created with that software do it.
and professionals who use software know if it is crap or excellent anyway..

and why logos(!) should have been created with povray?
i recommend that you march in any professional art studio and say that their
artists have to use a ray-tracing software for creating black and white
sketches.
i bet you will be laughed out.

Post a reply to this message