>The for-loops I have used in the past have also allowed a
>STEP parameter that defined the amount of increment for each loop. One
>wouldn't have to be limited to incrementing or decrementing by one.

AFAIK, the C-like for-loop that would be added to POV would not have any
limitations in this respect. The way I see it, the syntax would be as
follows:

#for (Counter has an initial value established*, Condition to exit**,
Step***)
 Stuff to do...
#end

*example: I=0, I=100, etc.
**example: I<5, I>3, I=3, etc.
***example: I++, I--, I+3, etc.

Post a reply to this message