|
|
Oh... I thought 150% was equivalent to 1.5 times. Hmm. Any math judges out
there? Just kidding!
Bob
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message
news:38ab68a3@news.povray.org...
| In article <38ab116e@news.povray.org> , "Bob Hughes"
| <omn### [at] hotmailcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote:
|
| >>> How do you get to this number?
| >>> I would estimate that he would at least get an increase of ybout 50%
| >>> Right, there's a smaller cache, but it is faster.
| >>
| >>I would also estimate 50% or so based on what I have seen on systems of some
| >>of my friends.
| >
| > Half the speed huh...? ;-)
| > But I know you mean double (I think).
|
| No, 50% in this context is correct. And 50% is not double, but means 1.5
| times the speed of the original system. ;-)
|
|
| Thorsten
|
|
| ____________________________________________________
| Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
| e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
|
| Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|