Hi Ken
Ken wrote:
>
> Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
>
> > I find it extremely hard to locate the threads among all these messages
> > that interest me.
> >
> > Please change the subject field when the discussion starts to branch off
> > to another subject.
> >
> > (On other news groups I have seen use of the keyword WAS in the subject
> > field but I am not sure of how this works.)
>
> As a long time visitor to these groups I would have to say that for the
> most part this is the longest on topic thread in the history of this
> news server. Usualy when it goes off topic it goes WAY off topic. For
> example some long threads start out talking about POV-Ray and talking
> about gun control. However I feel just about every message posted to
> this thread so far has in some way been related to the topic I started
> with.
OK, I had not read them all, so I was not sure. But some of those I
read was rather "sub-topic" (as you call them).
> So far I have been very happy with the progress of this thread
I agree: Many interesting opinions!
> even though I do not necessarily agree with everyone else's views on
> the subject.
I wasn't trying to say that I disagreed with anyone. I rather felt
helpless about not knowing the (sub-)subject" of all these postings.
One way for me to find out would be to read them all, but
unfortunately I do not have enough time for that.
> In direct response to your comments we have already seen
> three new threads start as a result of it which are as you suggest sub
> topic discussions.
Wouldn't it bee an idea to add the sub-topic at the end of the
original subject (like I did)?
Or would this cause problems with some news-readers?
Regards
Tor Olav
--
mailto:tor### [at] hotmail com
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html
Post a reply to this message
|