Nigel Stewart wrote:

> > One implication is that there are probably other efforts
> > to figure out generic DTD's (XML based file formats)
>
> Check out http://www.vrml.org/x3d.html, the working group
> who are figuring out how to migrate VRML to XML.
>

Arrrggg!!! Heelllppp!!!!

Run Away! Run Away!!!

Ok. sorry. it's not really all that bad. It's just that for many things,
VRML seems reaaaaaaaaaly ugly. Especially things like needing to
actually create a visible object before being able to reuse it, etc.

But, the big point of there being 3D XML efforts underway is a good one.

--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.

Post a reply to this message