|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Ken wrote:
>
> Gilles Tran wrote:
>
>
> Good point(s). What I also fear is that if the programming language
> is extended in POV-Ray to include OO programming, for () loops, and
> all of the other programming suggestions that have been addressed
> in this thread, is what is going to happen when some non programming
> literate POV-User comes to the news groups seeking help and some
> programmer type gives them an example in the form of these new
> features ?
How many times have you seen someone ask
"I have nested #while loops and the inner one doesn't work" ?
This is a problem that would go away with for() loops.
I fully agree that programming features are just a part of POV-Ray, but
who doesn't appreciate the efforts of people like Chris Colefax. How
much more productive would such #include writers be with better tools?
I also don't think anyone is advocating that the POV-team drop
development of the render engine in favour of the programming interface,
we all want faster, more realistic renders with more features ;^)
Cheers, PoD.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |