Hello,

Ron Parker wrote:
> 
> On 10 Mar 2000 07:58:40 -0500, Nieminen Juha wrote:
> >Axel Baune <aba### [at] neuroinformatikuni-ulmde> wrote:
> >: Besides this it would comlicate the
> >: parser of PoV if the other variant should be maintained.
> >
> >  Was this only a guess or do you really know that it will be conclusively
> >more complicated?
> 
> It had to have been a guess.  It wouldn't be that complicated to do.

As I've never looked into the Code for the PoV-Parser I' did"t know
exactly, but I've already written a parser of my own for my programms,
and therefore I know what effects it would have on my own parser if I
wish to include the new syntax. From this knowledge I've extrapolated to
the PoV-Parser.

Yours Axel Baune

Post a reply to this message