John VanSickle wrote:
> 
> A thousand pardons, but I thought it was using JPEG output that was
> okay, but that it lacked the quality needed for input.  Am I
> remembering things incorrectly?
> 

Output was considered not OK, becaus of unpredictable, lossy compression.
Input is OK, because many image maps are originally in JPEG anyway and
converting them to a non-lossy format won't help any.

Margus

Post a reply to this message