Steven Webb <ste### [at] badcheesecom> wrote:
>
> Hmmm.  Well, I suppose so.  What's wrong with the current selection of
> resolutions?  I have: 320x240, 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024,
> 1600x1200.  Are there others that I missed?

What if someone wanted to do a "widescreen" picture at, say, 800x450?
Or a square image, or one taller than it is wide?  I've frequently used
formats which didn't fit the usual 4/3 screen resolutions.

-- 
Jeff Lee         shi### [at] gatenet         http://www.gate.net/~shipbrk/

Post a reply to this message