Lovely wild idea. I even would support it with money.
I just want to keep the thing at my house. Here in Alaska.
Well, I guess I would need that cable modem service
upgrade for everyone to get a small share of time from it.
And while everyone else was sleeping, I could play
on the system.
I am sure that if the IMP team could afford one or two
of these that supported POVRay, well...



Sven-Erik Andersen wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 04:20:32 -0800, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
> >  I have known about this site for almost a year now and we have
> >discussed it on more than one occassion. It would be nice if it
> >had an architecture with built om programming that supported
> >POV-Ray directly.
> >
>  I read about it in the UK computer-mag 'Personal Computer World'
> (their January 2000 issue), and in the interview, Daniel Hall, one of
> the founders, says:
> 
>   "We are essentially the camera of the animation process.
>     We want every application to drive that camera."
> 
> So maybe with a little peer-pressure they would come up with a
> POV-interface... But I don't think that many in the POV-Ray community
> would actually buy one. <WILD IDEA>Maybe a lot of people could pool
> ther financial resources, buy one ore moore and create a communal
> render-farm...</WILD IDEA>
> 

> Happy New Year to everyone.)
> Sven-Erik Andersen
> ----
> sea### [at] mailcitycom
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Program/2549/

Post a reply to this message