Maybe 90-99% should be "And I know how radiosity works as
well".

Peter Popov wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 18:31:02 -0500, Alex Vandiver <van### [at] tiacnet>
> wrote:
> 
> >> Other additions are welcome. Alex, will you mind if I take over
> >> putting this test in a more organised form? Everyone: will you give me
> >> your permission to use your contributions?
> >
> >Go for it.  I've a feeling that many people have been compiling small
> >personal lists of their own.  Be careful that you don't overlap too much
> >with YKYBRTLW list. :) Also, an interesting scoring system has gotta be
> >invented.. I happen to like my sphere{0,1 pigment {rgb 0}} scheme, but
> >anything will do.  Numbers are just so boring; it should be a little more
> >appropriate, no?
> >-Alex
> 
> I'm working on the scoring system. Any advice on the different
> "grades" names and respective scores? Something along the lines of:
> 
> 0%     Illiterate -- "You're pov? Are you folks unemployed?"
> 0-39%  Newbee     -- "Where'd my sphere go?"
> 40-49% Artist     -- "Here's another vase image"
>   (ok, ok, maybe not that personal :) I'll think of something else)
> 50-59% Experienced-- "Only 255 entries in pigment_map?!"
> 60-69% Advanced   -- "What do you think of my macro?"
> 70-79% Nerd       -- "Hey, if you remove this line media gets smooth!"
> 80-89% Guru       -- "I just put all patches into one, interested?"
> 90-99% Nutcake    -- ... (no real example, help anyone?)
> 100%   A Raytracing God -- "Let there be light_source!"
> 
> I am beginning to collect all entries in this list in a file. Please
> come up with any suggestions for question. I will collect entries
> until the 15th of November and then post the list here. Please people,
> help make this test as good as it can be!
> 
> Peter Popov
> ICQ: 15002700

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

Post a reply to this message