Fabian Brau wrote:
> 
> Ok but if at the basis the raytracer is not capable to reproduce a big
> part of the reality you will draw something wrong when you will make
> your image (even if it is not photorealistic). It is very naive to
> believe that, for example, a (good) modern art painter cannot draw
> perfectly the reality! He doesn't do this because this don't interest
> him but he can do it. Look the first works of Picasso, you will see :)
> 
> Fabian.
> 

And what if he can't? Does that make his abstract paintings less valuable?
Do you really care whether, say, Jackson Pollock, could draw a perfect portrait?
He was a master with his dripping he doesn't have to be a master with a
still-life. That's beside the point. Art is not craft.
Do what you want to do, be it abstract or realistic, but do it as good as you
can and because you want to, not because others say you should.

Have fun,

Remco

Post a reply to this message