Oh... The docs say that assumed_gamma 1.0 will model the way light looks in the
real world.
Brendan Ryan

Edward Coffey wrote:

> Andrea Ryan <ary### [at] global2000net> wrote in message
> news:380A7F33.46F5F932@global2000.net...
> > I commented out the assumed_gamma and the image had the same brightness
> with
> > focal blur set to 1 as it did when it was set with 0. Set assumed_gamma to
> 2.2
> > for PC systems (UNIX too?). The POV-Ray docs has information on
> assumed_gamma.
> > Brendan Ryan
>
> While I appreciate your suggestion, it is more of a work-around than a
> bug-fix.  I choose to use a gamma of 1.0 in accordance with the POV-Ray
> documentation, but I really should be able to use whatever gamma I want and
> not have this discrepancy.

Post a reply to this message