|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <37ef2389@news.povray.org>, Nieminen Juha <war### [at] cc tut fi> wrote:
>Scott Sexton & David Lewis <2b### [at] cheerful com> wrote:
>: I have a newish eMachine (low priced PC) with an AMD 333Mhz K2 that
>: renders all my old povray scenes slower than my laptop with a 120Mhz
>: Pentium (like 1/3 the speed rather than 3 times faster, as I would think
>: it should). This very slow rendering performance occurs under both the
>: Win98 and Mandrake Linux 6.0 OS installations on the eMachine so it does
>: not appear to be a OS or software installation problem to me. (Perhaps
>: the K2's L2 cache? but the laptop is older and only has smallish
>: processor cache anyway.)
>
:
> Also I think that AMD has a quite slow FPU.
This is what I was told about my Evergreen 586 upgrade to my PC. A while ago I
rendered that simple glass that I made in sPatch... it took 7 hours to render
(setting max_trace_level high was part of the problem) but I was told then
that the AMD FPUs aren't that fast, however I never did hear back from that
person if they knew if it was all AMDs or just the older 586s....
This is something I need to look into. When I replace this PC with a new one
(I'm thinking about keeping the machine I got and run Linux on it, but anyway)
I don't want to go out and buy a poor performace FPU if I'm going to continue
to do stuff with POV (and I think I'm hooked now.... "you know you've been
raytracing too long when you setup a seperate configuration and icon for the
POVray Newsgroups).
PHIL
---------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |