Paranoia, that's it... sorry I spoke abruptly Thorsten.  I saw that
part of the quote from Chris Cason which Ken had posted and
immediately began to think of what life would be like having to always
use the Super Patch instead of a Official POV-Ray.  Sorry Ron, or more
appropriately the many contributors to S.P., I'm not saying I don't
care for S.P. of course  : )
Hmmm, does the frequently-asked-questions group have any posts
regarding 3.5?  A while back I unsubscribed to that, among others, to
cut down on news retrieval.  Don't think anything ever stops the
rumors from roaming though.

Bob

Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message
news:37eb28a0@news.povray.org...
> In article <37eb03e4@news.povray.org> , "Bob Hughes"
<inv### [at] aolcom>
> wrote:
>
> > Yikes.  No iso-surface part of the Official POV-Ray 3.5?  That's
got
> > to hurt.
>
> Why do you assume this?  "We will likely eliminate that part of the
patch."
> does obviously *not* mean we eliminate the whole patch, does it???
> Sorry for sounding a bit unfriendly, but I don't think wild rumors
or
> assumptions will help you find out what POV-Ray 3.5 can or will be
able to
> do :-)   And specifically the iso-surface issue has come up and been
> clarified several times by now ... if even the little bit of
information
> that there will be a 3.5 next and a few general issues about it
create such
> a lot of confusuion, maybe for 4.0 there should be no details
available in
> advance?
>
>
>      Thorsten
>
>
> PS: This is my _own_ opinion, I do not speak (write) for the team!
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany

Post a reply to this message