You know, this makes me think the confusion might be the "scene" part
of the names for those two file groups p.b.s-f and p.t.s-f.  A scene
is usually thought of as a Pov file, not even a Inc (certainly not any
Ini : ) files).  Stop me if I'm being rhetorical... too late.  A
"binary" ought to mean only that, end product being pre-coded. And
"text" is extremely obvious to me anyhow.
Far as utilities go, 'macro' or no, I'd say use the binary/text
decision process.  I'd certainly expect to find those macros in either
place depending on that criteria.

Bob

Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:37E06B7D.70F381B2@pacbell.net...
>
>
> Alan Kong wrote:
>
> >   If macros and include files are compared with both third-party
executable
> > programs and POV-Ray scene files, they are more clearly associated
with the
> > scene files. This is the criteria on which I based my opinions.
And it is
> > just an opinion - I don't foresee any sort of official policy
towards this
> > end. It isn't really a problem. I was just thinking about where
*I* would
> > look first for macros and include files that are posted in the
groups.
>
> For what it is worth I agree 99%
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> See my 1000+ Povray and 3D Rendering and Raytracing Links at:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html

Post a reply to this message