Do I care?? Yes.
Whoa, wavelength capable sort of thing too eh? Um, why not, if you
think you can do it ;)
About the attenuation part in shadow. Probably because it is related
in a way by appearence alone? I have no idea though.
Has Ron P. spoke up about any of this yet? Didn't see him over at the
p.b.i. though it's still early. I'm thinking Super Patch of course....

Bob

Edward C. <edw### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:37c62c19@news.povray.org...
> I am working on an expansion for the object interior attenuation
which
> allows the user to specify an extra keyword 'fade_colour', so that
the
> attenuation tends to a specific colour, rather than just to black.
A sample
> image and explanation of why this is good are posted in p.b.i.
> My questions to you are:
> Do you care?  (ie would you find this handy?)
> Should I expand on this to allow the user to specify different fade
rates
> for red, green and blue?
> Why are filter and transmit values attenuated in the shadow
calculation code
> (compute_shadow_texture)?
> And why not in the visible texture calculation code
> (compute_lighted_texture)?
>
>

Post a reply to this message