|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999 19:28:33 +0200, ingo wrote:
>Ron Parker heeft geschreven in bericht <37a85246@news.povray.org>...
>Biggest problem for the software is to find the corresponding pixels in the two
>pictures. I've done this lots of times by hand. I use a kite plus sterocamera to
>do some aerial photography.
That's the part I'm concerned about, actually. I can generally figure out the
rest from scratch when I need it (That's not to say that I won't just use what
you've derived instead... I will.) I assume that real-world software does this
by sliding a window across the right image and doing some sort of statistical
correlation with a fixed window on the left image, but I haven't been able to
create anything here that gives me satisfactory results. That may be due to
a lack of good data, however. I will keep trying, of course. I won't actually
need any of this stuff for at least six months, and if I don't have it the
world won't end.
>http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Start.html
>This is a site on remote sensing, I have not explored it yet but chapter 11 is
>about stereo stuff.
Thanks, That's a very nice site in and of itself, though I didn't find anything
I could use at the moment. Nevertheless, I will be passing it along to my
teacher friend to add to the website she's making for her students as a
starting point for independent study.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |