I tend to agree, there should be a separate keyword(limit_object?
limited_by?) and the inconsistency is annoying. I don't think it would
be difficult at all to do this, but I don't know anything about the
isosurface source.(This "bounding" shape is necessary for the
calculation method to work)
However, I think you can still declare an isosurface, and then manually
bound an instance of that isosurface, and it will work normally. I
haven't tried it, though, but if it works, it would allow vampire
isosurfaces, etc.

Post a reply to this message