Matt Giwer wrote:

> Nieminen Mika wrote:
>
> > Ron Parker <par### [at] fwicom> wrote:
> > : As a counterexample I offer Warp's sig. >:)
>
> >   At least my sig can be posted without multipart mime-encoding...
>
>         Is that a good thing or an old fart stick in the mud position?
>
> >   And anyways, it's a good signature. It has my nick. Twice. ;)
>
>         And that is a good thing? To post something as a sig that only
> those familar with obscure legal but unprofession C code can read
> if they want to waste the time?
>
>         Please explain why and exercise in obscurity is a good thing.
>

Obscure sigs have long been a time-honored tradition in the Internet
community. (now that the video's out, I think I have to change mine).


--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.

Post a reply to this message