Bob wrote in message <37748FEB.71DAA10B@aol.com>...

Hi again Bob, sorry to be taking so much of your attention ...

>Yes, I knew I should have mentioned that the image map I made for the
browsers is
>supposed to be for Netscape 2.* or higher and I'm guessing about IE 3.*
and higher also.

The weird thing is most of that stuff works fine in Cyberdog (it doesn't
like progressive JPEGs, nested tables or JavaScript, and animated GIFs
need to be done 'right' as far as refresh options or they look awful)

>It's just that I went on the typical naive assumption that most people
would be using
>one which is compatible enough to do the linking. I wouldn't dare use
Java Script but I

Image map worked fine.

>might possibly do the more usual "links" method instead, especially if
several people
>can't use the image map as is. Aw heck, I'll try links to those zoomed
in views
>elsewhere anyway. I don't want frustration to occur if I can help it.

Methinks you've grabbed the wrong end of the stick - My problem was that
once on the location submission page, the pop-up menus were only getting
the first list entry, the rest were being dumped onto the page.

Again I dunno why Cyberdog would behave this way and Netscrape properly
(first time I've seen CD do it, so I assumed that it was the page...),
might have a look at the source...

Ah-ha - Each of your menus has items that look like this:
<Option>value<BR>

Lose the <BR> and Cyberdog (and possibly other finicky browsers) should
be fine - least that's the major difference between your menus and, say,
altavista's.

>Btw, there's going to be a magnified look at Australia later. Main
reason is because of

Excellent :-)

>the Melbourne folks. So don't get discouraged you upsidedowners (just
kidding), it's

Dunno that I'd do it for them :-)
(parochialism alive and well down under)

>just that there will always be the likelyhood of such close markers
that won't always be
>separable so don't expect zooms of zooms please.

Not good enough! :-)

Have Fun
Martin
--
<Spa### [at] tesseractcomau> is a valid address
If you prefer mnemonic addresses you can use:
<Martin 'at' tesseract.com.au> or <Martin.Crisp 'at' Tourism.tas.gov.au>

My opinions should not be taken as indicative of Tourism Tasmania's
opinions

Post a reply to this message