Yeah, however I had said it with an emphasis upon a ongoing "aging"; quote: aged
*another* 2 years :unquote. Just so I clarify this. You never know though, Lance could
have been impersonating a teenager all this time and really be a one year old (happy
1st
birthday then Lance!) with powers of mental capacity we can only imagine. Then again
maybe not.


Mark Wagner wrote:
> 
> If you work out the math of the original post, the implication is of a
> chronological age of two years.
> 

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message