|
|
On Sun, 02 May 1999 23:01:15 -0400, TonyB <ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote:
>> You must have at least some light on all parts of a normal or it will not
>> show. Thought maybe the tilde 0.3 for the 'brilliance' was a negative
>> number, guess Margus uses a tilde the same way I do, short for
>> approximately.
>
>I didn't know that's what that thingy (~) was called. I've always called that
>(pronounce like the yn in Grand Canyon).
Odd... I learned that the squiggle used atop an n in Spanish is called a tilde.
WWWebster (http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary) agrees with me, for English,
and Babelfish (http://babelfish.altavista.digital.com) doesn't translate it.
(It doesn't translate vi'rgula the other way, either.) I had always called
the symbol by itself (as used in C programming and web addresses) a tilde, too,
but always with some reservations. WWWebster tells me that I need not have
worried, as that is sense 2 of the definition.
The mark you posted, assuming I saw the same thing you saw (an a with a ' over
it) is an acute accent. The mark that goes the other way (i.e. `) is a grave
accent.While I'm at it, the .. is called either a diaeresis or an umlaut,
depending on usage. All those marks, and others like the single dot, the bar,
the circumflex, and the u-shaped-thingy that marks a short vowel, are called
diacritics, or diacritical marks.
Post a reply to this message
|
|