> You must have at least some light on all parts of a normal or it will not
> show. Thought maybe the tilde 0.3 for the 'brilliance' was a negative
> number, guess Margus uses a tilde the same way I do, short for
> approximately.

I didn't know that's what that thingy (~) was called. I've always called that


(pronounce like the yn in Grand Canyon).

Post a reply to this message