|
|
You must have at least some light on all parts of a normal or it will not
show. Thought maybe the tilde 0.3 for the 'brilliance' was a negative
number, guess Margus uses a tilde the same way I do, short for
approximately. Well, if you want an interesting effect when using
brilliance now that you're willing to try it out anyway, use a small
negative number instead. 'brilliance -0.3' would make the edges, or
light/shadow terminator, of an object brighten instead of darken. Only
trouble with it is that it's difficult to control.
TonyB wrote:
>
> > Did you check the moon texture I posted? I mentioned it in a reply to the
> > original Bryce post. Basically, try a brilliance of ~0.3
>
> Yes, I saw it. Very nice. What I didn't like was how the bump-map dissapears
> where no light hits the object.
>
> I've never used brilliance. I'll go check it out. Thanks.
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|