POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.bugreports : Bug in CSG difference with clipped_by : Re: Bug in CSG difference with clipped_by Server Time
23 Jun 2024 16:00:16 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Bug in CSG difference with clipped_by  
From: Nieminen Mika
Date: 28 Apr 1999 15:14:18
Message: <37274ffa.0@news.povray.org>
Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote:
: Far as I've known 'clipped_by' behaves similarly to a cut command in an
: image processing program, ie. extracts the selected region, discarding
: it. I too have thought it opposite the usual way you would want to use
: it, but this seems correct if thought of right. Clipping snips off from
: the clipped object, unless the surface of the clipping object is
: inversed thus making for a collecting instead. Basically it's a
: 'difference' and 'merge' together sort of thing in my view. By the way I
: think 'bounded_by' is intended to be the inversed clipped_by isn't it?

  No.
  clipped_by works exactly like the intersection CSG except that it doesn't
render the surface of the second (ie. the clipping) object.
  bounded_by has little, if nothing, to do with CSG. You may think about it
as if it worked like an intersection CSG (but better not since you may get
surprises in some cases).

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.