|
 |
I'm a little astounded. Contradictory, I know, "little", "astounded".
Starting to read that I first thought, okay WinPOV is doing better
maybe. By the time I finished looking at it the variances, for the
better mostly are way different than my expectations.
Is the DOS memory stuff just outdated or something?
And that lathe, well, I figured it had to be a Windows cohort all along
anyhow, if you know what I mean.
Nice testing Nieminen.
What's a Mac? j/k! Don't test on one, if I found out it cuts rendering
50% I'd have to get me one.
Ken wrote:
>
> Nieminen Mika wrote:
> >
> > Q: Is POV-Ray for DOS faster than POV-Ray for windows?
> >
> > A: To my surprise the answer is: No.
> >
>
> Those are some interesting results. They seem to mirror the results
> I recieved when testing between the differently compiled windows versions
> and 3.1 releases. It certainly supports using the msvc build of windows
> if speed is your need. Where is the results for the Mac ?
>
> Some day instead of saying to someone going on an important mission
> "God speed with you " we will be able to say instead "Pov speed with you"
> Wouldn't that be nice ?
>
> Can I presume that this will be added to the VFAQ ?
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aol com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
