Oh wow, hey, that might work huh? Thanks for the new incentive, and the
S.P.
Gee, is nothing impossible...? If you see a DF3-made image at
binaries.images later on you will know I succeeded.


Ron Parker wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 13:21:07 -0500, Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >I couldn't help but notice the "CSG-able" word said. I wanted a DF3 of a
> >complex model once and came up with mixed results. Basically it didn't
> >work in other words (although it almost did it seemed), and I repeatedly
> >got a "patch object not allowed" during parse as I tried in vain to get
> >the model sliced up right.
> >So I guess this is impossible? No work-arounds? Well, I'm not giving up.
> 
> If you have the Superpatch you could use trace() to do what you're wanting
> to do.  In fact, you could write a macro that takes an object, a filename,
> and the desired resolution and automatically creates the df3 file for you.
> It wouldn't be the fastest thing on Earth, but it wouldn't be too terrible.

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message