OK, now I see what you mean, and I suppose that it is good that there are no
subdivisions of that manner...

I still think it could be good though... but I do understand what you're
saying there, so I think I'll just drop it now, after all, if I was going to
receive a response it would have happened by now :)

--
Lance.


---
For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
Colorblind - http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/parallax/359/colorblind

Bob Hughes wrote...
>Just thought I should mention this. From what I *think* I have heard
>said in the past the POV-Team doesn't like the idea of individuality
>concerning POV-Ray itself (I know I may be wording this terribly bad)
>which presumably goes for the website, this set of newsgroups, and as
>used to be at Compuserves POV-Ray Forum or anything tied directly to the
>POV-Team. I say this like it sounds awful but this doesn't mean all
>individuals or groups other than the immediate POV thing isn't regulated
>in any way whatsoever outside of the legal statement stuff.
>I'm willing to bet this is a reason there wouldn't be
>age/sex/race/religion/etc division (even if additive-like) ever
>considered within this realm for the sake of ambiguity among the users
>when on the property of POV-Ray.
>Am I way off base anyone? Or am I close to the right concept? I'm just
>hypothesizing from what I've understood in the past.
>
>
>Lance Birch wrote:
>>
>> he he he, you bet!
>>
>> --
>> Lance.
>>
>> ---
>> For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
>> The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
>> For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
>> Colorblind -
http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/parallax/359/colorblind
>
>--
> omniVERSE: beyond the universe
>  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
> mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message