|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
> But eroticism requires something a little less "perfect". I guess raytracing
> will be able to do convincing erotic art about the same time it can do a
> convincing close-up of an old man/woman's face (or has someone done this?)
The close-up of the clown in "Bingo" is, methinks, pretty convincing. Maybe
it's the heavy makeup that does it... Bare skin have always been very
difficult to get exactly, exactly right, and it always looks very phony
whenever it isn't exactly, exactly right.
/Hexmaster.com, www
Post a reply to this message
|
|