|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Good idea.
(quoted from your web page)
> However,
> to my eye the middle has somewhat larger steps than either end,...
Hmmm, maybe, if I had a couple beers I could agree, but it's so slight, I'd
agree with "equal uniform steps all the way across", except right at the white
end.
> ...and
> the rightmost step, from 82% to 100%, is anomalously large.
Agree. But maybe not to the same degree as what you see - I wouldn't say
"anomalously large" but "somewhat greater". Difference in words, or
differences in sight?
People should state what kind of monitor they're using, esp. if not a standard
CRT monitor.
I'm looking at your page on a Philips 17" flat screen LCD display, a Brilliance
151AX. Cost some $$$, but I love the space it saves, so much lighter to carry
around. Sold the clunky old CRT monitor. "Gamma" has a whole new meaning for
me now. Colors look more saturated, but white-gray-black scales look very
good, details in shadows, details in highlights. So good, I am almost tempted
to stop working on my revision of the Unlimited Light patch....
--
Daren Scot Wilson
dar### [at] pipeline com
www.newcolor.com
----
"Do you think I'd eat those things? If you saw the poisons we put
on them you wouldn't ask that question. You'd never eat another..."
-- a farmer
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |