Ken wrote in message <36E### [at] pacbellnet>...

>   With that out of the way I recommend that people reading this message
> take a little time to stop by the posted links below and see what the guy
> has to say on the subject.
>

I remember having read that a long time ago -I have them bookmarked :)-,
because it is indexed somewhere in serious3d.com, before I received my first
and only issue -now it will go online-.  I remember that clearly because it
prompted me to re-think what I thought. Of course, rebel to death, I do not
agree completely.  Why? Because I consider photorealism to be a trend.
Technically, this is, the content and reasons given by Fleming are
excellent. Even If I do not agree with the trend -flow- they worth every
letter read.  An advantage - for me- is that I do not work with graphics
every day and somehow I see the whole thing from another point of view.  I
also recommend something that illustrates the "other" point of view.  These
articles are about Digital Aesthetics and yes, are current.

Part 1

http://www.webreference.com/graphics/essay/essay2/index.html

Part2

http://www.webreference.com/graphics/essay/essay3/index.html

Part 3

http://www.webreference.com/graphics/essay/essay4/index.html


Thanks Ken for this reminder. I had almost forgot it! I do not know exactly
what I have in my HD.

Regards,
Marjorie Graterol

Post a reply to this message