Bob Hughes wrote:
<snip>
>Wonder about the
>wallpaper files, BMP then right. What resolution(s) were you thinking
>about? 640x480 and larger duplicate files. Seeing that the 640x480 has a
>file size of around 1 megabyte several of these would make for a largish
>file even zipped. Wonder how big a d/l is too big for most people? Also
>because I would be filling in more of the xoom space sooner or later
>myself.
>This is of course only if there were to be multiple pictures ditto'd at
>various sizes.
>Answer back anything, if you will, Rune or Psych.
<snip>

My Win95 with MS-plus don't have any problems with .jpg-files as
wallpaper. I don't know if others have.

I think a 640x480 image would be the best choice. That means you can
always see the whole image. At least I would prefer having a frame around
the image instead of having some of the image cut off.
We could also have multiple pictures, but wouldn't that be pretty big?
What do you think?

With MS-plus one can also have the image stretched so it fits to the
screen, but I know, not everyone have MS-plus.

BTW I can also have a copy of the final theme on my homepage.

Rune S. Johansen
http://hjem.get2net.dk/rsj

Post a reply to this message