|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 22:13:47 -0500, Stephen Lavedas
<swl### [at] virginia edu> wrote:
>Are you defining the Helix by rotation or by sin and cos? I have
By sin and cos, but the result is still a vector :)
>written a function to wrap a Helix around a Helix using sins and cos, so
>I think I should be able to do what you are asking if I understand
>correctly. Now, do you want the #macro to define one point/vector, or a
>whole series of points/vectors... Actually, that is an important
>destinction... you want the VECTOR right? The vector from the axis of
Yes, I need the *vector*. Not the one from the axis (which, as I
mentioned, is dH(t)/dt or, as you say, point 2 - point 1), but that of
the actual helix coiled around the axis.
>the object being wrapped around... hmmm... um... let me look at the
>Reorient #macro....I can give you the points...then the vector would be
>the difference of the two points right? That is what you want? That
>value?
>
>Steve
>
>sorry if I am being dense...
Sorry for being denser :)
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |