Ronald L. Parker <par### [at] mailfwicom> wrote:
: That is a ridiculous statement.  In fact, unless you have an obscene
: amount of memory, NT is much slower because it eats so much memory
: just standing still.  For example, my current installation of NT5
: eats up 64M at boot time.  Even when I upgraded to 128M, it's no
: faster than 98.

  I have seen win95 working just fine in a 486 66MHz with 8M of RAM.

-- 
main(i){char*_="BdsyFBThhHFBThhHFRz]NFTITQF|DJIFHQhhF";while(i=
*_++)for(;i>1;printf("%s",i-70?i&1?"[]":" ":(i=0,"\n")),i/=2);} /*- Warp. -*/

Post a reply to this message