|
|
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
: Just to play the devil's advocate here...
Why that doesn't surprise me?-)
Your point of view is also very justifiable and probably true.
But anyways, there's another thing the method I presented might help and
which I forget to mention in my article:
Often people score very low in each category if the image is very ugly,
but if they have to state arguments for their vote, then they really have
to think why they are giving so low scores, and perhaps they will notice
that scoring very low in each category is not very fair, since, although
very ugly, the image may have a very good idea which represents very well
the topic, etc.
Perhaps (this is only a dream...) this way votes would be more fair.
--
main(i){char*_="BdsyFBThhHFBThhHFRz]NFTITQF|DJIFHQhhF";while(i=
*_++)for(;i>1;printf("%s",i-70?i&1?"[]":" ":(i=0,"\n")),i/=2);} /*- Warp. -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|