That kind of evaluation will not work because it is vague.
I would like to see:
- Change the rules on voting. eg, Vote. Send your image, register,
vote and you will be IN the contest . Only if you vote, there are a lot of
programs
that make just that, if not, do them.
- Why don't use a simple scale? What is the problem with a scale?
Very simple:  The evaluator has to know What to evaluate and how,  points
are
non important, because they can always be translated into the 20.
-I am interested in a scale - I am making one* and I would like you to help
me-. Who is eager to establish what 'exact' parameters are needed to
evaluate the technical part? Will you please send me your check points? No
matter
how many points you assign; if 100 points are what you are used to, will be
OK.
- Maybe CSG use, loops and so on,  modeling (does that scores or not, does
that is completely neccessary for the image to be what it is?, are we
evaluating the image as a POVimage or a raytraced image,  which are the same
but are not the same.etc
 Thanks in advance,

Marjorie Graterol

* The scale is for my use primarily, so it will be imperfect, but it is
something to start with. I refuse to enter in the next round and then saying
the same thing all over again. I will publish it in my home home page once I
finish them ( the scale AND the page redesign). I'll post the link  only to
the scale.

>
>Or as you say maybe it will force them into thinking about what they
>are doing. Unfortunately human nature favors my former arguments.
>
>
>Art critics are a fickle bunch and you may quote me on that.
>
>--
>Ken Tyler
>
>tyl### [at] pacbellnet
>

Post a reply to this message