In article <36A0408B.AA42F8C3@aol.com> , Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aolcom>  wrote:

>You mean it is just a rumor!?
>Or you didn't understand what I was saying?
>Thought it had been said that all the previous versions would sooner or
>later be parseable, but I may be wrong after all. Perhaps the 1.0, 2.0,
>and 3.0 would be parseable yet not include the atmosphere or halo in
>3.0*.
>Am I getting warmer?

As you can read in Chris Youngs "Plans for 1999" letter, we will try to parse and
convert as much as *possible*. We never discussed automatic halo and atmosphere
conversion and *I* simply don't know if this is possible at all. - And keep in mind
that the halo and atmosphere features 8as well as radiosity) were declared
experimental.


    Thorsten

Post a reply to this message