david sharp wrote:
>
> Well, in my case, this is actually the most likely cause,
> but I cutnpasted directly from the source.
Hmmm... that's odd since I cut and pasted from your previous post and
it worked. I tried it with 3.1a official and my latest compile of
UVPov and both worked just fine (is 3.1d broken here?).
-Nathan
Post a reply to this message
|