Mike wrote:
>
> How about giving us the new keywords and a little about what they
> control and we could probably come to a consensus? Either that, or just
> think to yourself, if I was just using the program and not writing it,
> what would make sense to me.
>
> I think some good examples are the keywords for radiosity. Like
> grey_threshold could just be grey. 100% grey is no color. Simpler but
> makes sense. I think minimum_reuse could just be reuse.
>
> I agree with Ron that it's customary for reserved keywords to use all
> lowercase and user defined terms should start with a Cap. So be
> specific. People can change variable names that conflict with them;
> that's what the message window is for. ;)
>
> -Mike
What Mike said !
Ken would like to pipe in quickly with a plea for shorter keywords and no
under_scored identifiers. The sooner they are fazed out of exsistence
the better.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|